Hakone Hotel Guide - Historic Hotels in Hakone, Kanagawa Prefecture

"Amazing service scenery and location with onsen in room"

"This was a midway stop point for us to take a break and recharge. Hyatt Hakone did not disappoint. Felt peaceful and relax. Staff, Food, property was amazing. "

"Beautiful facility and grounds, traditional interior design and outdoor onsen make for a very special setting."

"Room was amazing. The old architecture with modern amenities was great. The onsen was beautiful. The hotel itself and the area around the hotel, including the gardens were stunning and fun to explore. A perfect oasis, I wish we could have stayed longer. Some lovely shops and restaurants within walking distance. The free shuttle up the hill to the train station was appreciated, although the walk down to the hotel is worth doing. Stop at Naraya cafe as well!"

"Staff is very attentive however there is very little options for dining and no transport after 630pm with no options for taxi / I was also disappointed that we were not allowed in the onsen areas due to very small tattoos however we were stilled charged the “bath fee” for resort without being allowed to use the areas . I feel a discount should be made for guests the refuse service to these areas or allow for them to book private times. Charging guests for resort fees when they do not allow them to use the area isn’t acceptable - again staff was very pleasant amd we enjoy the area even with upgrading g to mt Fuji lake view without any view due to rain - we are happy with the hotel but still disagree with extra charges for bath and resort fee since we were refused entrance / we were also charged very large tourist tax which was not informed until check out my Expedia bill said we would pay Y76000 our final bill was over Y108800 because of bath fee and tourist fees I wish to look to be refunded for the bath fees or please consider policy changes for other guests when they are refused entrance - charging your guests then not permitting them to enjoy these areas is in quality service I expected "